Decoupling or nondecoupling: Is that theRbquestion?
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 54 (1) , 1176-1181
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.54.1176
Abstract
The top quark is well known for the nondecoupling effects it implies in and . The recent experimental data exhibit a disagreement with the SM prediction at more than the level. It is tempting to explore whether this might be due to nondecoupling new physics effects, opposite to those of the top quark. We investigate this issue in the context of models with an extra family of right- or left-handed singlet or doublet quarks. It is shown that, contrary to what one might naively expect, the nondecoupling properties of a mirror do not have an impact on , due to a conspiracy of the mixing angles, imposed by the requirement that there be no mixing. Our analysis agrees with an analysis performed independently, which includes this model as a particular case.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implications for Supersymmetry of the Reported Deviations from the Standard Model forandPhysical Review Letters, 1996
- Z→bb¯ versus dynamical electroweak symmetry breaking involving the top quarkPhysical Review D, 1995
- A heavy top quark and the vertex in non-commuting extended technicolorPhysics Letters B, 1994
- Non-oblique corrections in extended technicolor theoryPhysics Letters B, 1993
- The minimal supersymmetric standard model and electroweak precision dataPhysics Letters B, 1993
- Radiative corrections toin the minimal supersymmetric standard modelPhysical Review D, 1991
- b-production on the Z-resonance: A challenge to the standard modelNuclear Physics B, 1991
- The width of theZ bosonThe European Physical Journal C, 1988
- Γ(Z → bb): A signature of hard mass terms for a heavy topPhysics Letters B, 1988
- Electroweak one-loop corrections to the decay of the neutral vector bosonNuclear Physics B, 1986