Don't Bury the V/Q Scan: It's as Good as Multidetector CT Angiograms with a Lot Less Radiation Exposure
Open Access
- 12 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Society of Nuclear Medicine in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Vol. 49 (1) , 5-8
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.048066
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Very Low Probability Interpretation of V/Q Lung Scans in Combination with Low Probability Objective Clinical Assessment Reliably Excludes Pulmonary Embolism: Data from PIOPED IIJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2007
- A Reduced Role of V/Q Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary EmbolismJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2007
- Estimating Risk of Cancer Associated With Radiation Exposure From 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary AngiographyJAMA, 2007
- American College of Radiology White Paper on Radiation Dose in MedicineJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2007
- Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy Is More Sensitive than Multidetector CTPA in Detecting Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease as a Treatable Cause of Pulmonary HypertensionJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2007
- Multidetector Computed Tomography for Acute Pulmonary EmbolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Female Breast Radiation Exposure During CT Pulmonary AngiographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2005
- Overview of prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis IISeminars in Nuclear Medicine, 2002
- Deep venous thrombosis and the risk of pulmonary embolism. A systematic study.Chest, 1992
- Value of the Ventilation/Perfusion Scan in Acute Pulmonary EmbolismJAMA, 1990