Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate
- 1 July 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Applied Physiology
- Vol. 59 (1) , 87-91
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1985.59.1.87
Abstract
To identify the degree of difference between treadmill and floor walking, kinematic, electromyographic (EMG), and heart rate measurements were recorded in seven normal female subjects during walking at three speeds on the treadmill and on the floor. During treadmill walking, subjects tended to use a faster cadence and shorter stride length than during floor walking. In addition the displacements of the head, hip, and ankle in the sagittal plane showed statistically significant differences between floor and treadmill walking. Average EMG activity was usually greater on the treadmill than on the floor; however, this difference was only significant for the quadriceps. Heart rate was significantly higher during fast treadmill walking than floor walking. In general, treadmill walking was not found to differ markedly from floor walking in kinematic measurements or EMG patterns.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Energy cost of treadmill and floor walking at self-selected pacesEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1983
- Changes in knee function associated with treadmill ambulationJournal of Biomechanics, 1983