Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code
- 7 December 1996
- Vol. 313 (7070) , 1445-1447
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1445
Abstract
The introduction of scientific and experimental methodology into clinical medicine in the nineteenth century brought with it an increased demand for experimentation on human subjects, particularly in bacteriology, immunology, and physiology. This research was done mainly on patients in hospital, often without their consent, under an “ethos of science and medical progress.” As a result of injury to some patients subjected to non-therapeutic research, however, controversy and public debate ensued about the ethics of human experimentation.1 2 3 4Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time to face up to research misconductBMJ, 1996
- Doctors under HitlerGerman Studies Review, 1990
- A History and Theory of Informed Consent. By Ruth R. Faden and Tom L. Beauchamp (with Nancy M. P. King) (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. xv, 392p. $29.95).American Political Science Review, 1988
- Todliche Wissenschaft: Die Aussonderung von Juden, Zigeunern und Geisteskranken, 1933-1945German Studies Review, 1985
- Reichsrundschreiben 1931: Pre-Nuremberg German Regulations Concerning New Therapy and Human ExperimentationJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1983