The First Amendment and The New Anti-Pornography Statutes
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in News for Teachers of Political Science
- Vol. 45, 16-21
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0197901900004104
Abstract
This essay seeks, in a very preliminary way, to explore the constitutional ramifications of a new wave of laws designed to combat pornography. Pornography is not new, of course; and neither are laws designed to curtail it. It has long been prohibited by federal and state statutes. The first state obscenity law was passed in Vermont in 1821, and the first federal statute, which prohibited the importation of obscene materials such as “French post cards,” was enacted in 1842. As early as 1931, in Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court announced that obscenity was not entitled to constitutional protection under the First Amendment.What has changed is the economics of the sex industry, the demography of its constituency, and the nature of the materials themselves. Pornography today is flourishing as never before; by some estimates it is a $7 billion industry.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Indiana Law Journal: Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems*Published by Taylor & Francis ,2018
- The Effects of Multiple Exposures to Filmed Violence Against WomenJournal of Communication, 1984
- The Effects of Aggressive-Pornographic Mass Media StimuliPublished by Elsevier ,1982
- Pornography, Men Possessing WomenFeminist Review, 1982