Less Guilty by Reason of Adolescence: Developmental Immaturity, Diminished Responsibility, and the Juvenile Death Penalty.
Top Cited Papers
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in American Psychologist
- Vol. 58 (12) , 1009-1018
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.58.12.1009
Abstract
The authors use a developmental perspective to examine questions about the criminal culpability of juveniles and the juvenile death penalty. Under principles of criminal law, culpability is mitigated when the actor's decision-making capacity is diminished, when the criminal act was coerced, or when the act was out of character. The authors argue that juveniles should not be held to the same standards of criminal responsibility as adults, because adolescents' decision-making capacity is diminished, they are less able to resist coercive influence, and their character is still undergoing change. The uniqueness of immaturity as a mitigating condition argues for a commitment to a legal environment under which most youths are dealt with in a separate justice system and none are eligible for capital punishment.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Juvenile Death Penalty and International LawDuke Law Journal, 2002
- An Introduction to Retirement CommunitiesResearch on Aging, 2002
- The Evolution of Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective on Juvenile Justice ReformThe Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1997
- Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making.Law and Human Behavior, 1996
- Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contexts.Law and Human Behavior, 1995
- Risk taking in adolescence: A decision-making perspectiveDevelopmental Review, 1992
- How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planningDevelopmental Review, 1991
- PrefaceSeminars in Speech and Language, 1990
- Toward "personhood" for adolescents: Autonomy and privacy as values in public policy.American Psychologist, 1983
- Review and theoretical analysis of the effects of group processes upon individual and group decisions involving risk.Psychological Bulletin, 1971