Abstract
We compared postoperative pain and narcotic requirements, oxygen saturation (Sao2) and length of stay in the post‐anesthesia care unit (PACU) in patients who received 30 ml of either 0.25% bupivacaine (B) or saline placebo (S) infiltrated into the operative incision. Twenty ASA I–III patients undergoing abdominal surgery were studied in a double‐blinded randomized prospective trial. Study and control groups were not different in patient age, procedure, intra‐operative narcotics administered or preoperative Sao2. In the PACU, patients receiving B had significantly lower analog pain scores (6.0 vs 8.3, P=0.02). They had lower respiratory rates (15.6 b/min vs 19.1, P=0.02), required significantly less narcotic (4.5 mg morphine sulphate vs 11.0, P=0.03) and were discharged from the PACU almost an hour sooner than patients receiving S (P = 0.02). Patients receiving B had significantly higher minimum Sao2 than those receiving S (93.3 % vs 89.9, P=0.04). Discharge pain scores, Sao2 and respiratory rates were not significantly different between B and S groups. Finally, mean requirements for narcotics for the first 24 h were reduced by approximately 30% (from 406.9 mg meperidine to 255.5 mg, P=0.006). This study demonstrates that infiltration of a long‐acting local anesthetic lowers initial pain scores and requirement for narcotics in the PACU. The effect can be seen for at least the first 24 h. A lower requirement for postoperative narcotics is accompanished by faster wake‐up, more alert patients, and, most importantly, higher Sao2 and shorter PACU stay. This may have a significant effect on pulmonary morbidity following abdominal operations.