The directional sensitivity of retinal rods.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Rod field sensitivity, 10-S(r) (i.e., the reciprocal of the radiance of a background required for 10-fold elevation of rod threshold) was measured for monochromatic backgrounds traversing the pupil at various points (r) on 3 subjects. The wave-length dependency of the directional sensitivities of the 3 foveal cone mechanisms of the principal subject were reported previously (Alpern et Kitahara, 1983). Rods, as cones, are less sensitive to obliquely incident, than to normally incident backgrounds. At the pupil margin (4 mm) the effect is between 0.368 and 0.976 log10 units smaller for rods. After correction for losses by corneal reflection and by absorption in the lens, S(r) for rods is reasonably described by the parabolic equation used by Stiles (1937) to quantify the directional sensitivity of cones. The small effect for rods precludes a description as consistently precise as this equation provides for cones. The steepness of the parabolic curve best fitting the directional sensitivity data of the rods of the principal subject was independent of background wave number. For a 2nd subject, whose rods are supposed to be smaller, it was directly proportional to the square of that wave number. The latter is the expectation if the directional sensitivity of this subject''s rods were determined by principles outlined in the diffraction theory of Simon (1970).