Serologic Response to Revaccination With Two Rubella Vaccines
- 1 October 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Vol. 130 (10) , 1081-1084
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1976.02120110043005
Abstract
• Three years after receiving rubella vaccine, 1,060 elementary school children living on the island of Maui, Hawaii, were revaccinated with either HPV-77 DE-5 or RA 27/3 rubella vaccine given subcutaneously or intranasally in order to compare the effectiveness of these two vaccines in raising antibody titers. RA 27/3 was the more effective booster vaccine, producing fourfold or greater titer rises in 20.1% of recipients, including 80% of children with hemagglutinationinhibiting antibody titers ≤ 1:40 at the time of revaccination. Intranasal revaccination was not significantly more effective than subcutaneous revaccination, although it did elicit higher titers in children who responded. Responses differed according to the vaccine that children had received three years earlier. Because antibody titers have persisted in vaccinated children, routine administration of a second dose of rubella vaccine is not currently recommended. (Am J Dis Child 130:1081-1084, 1976)This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Collected RecommendationsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2016
- Experience with rubella and rubella immunization in institutionalized childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1973
- Seroepidemiology of Rubella and ReinfectionArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1969