Omeprazole versus placebo in duodenal ulcer healing
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Digestive Diseases and Sciences
- Vol. 35 (1) , 66-72
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01537225
Abstract
The study objective was to study the ulcer healing effects and safety of the proton pump inhibitor, omeprazole, given in a dose of 20 mg once daily before breakfast. The study design was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of omeprazole and placebo using endoscopy to assess ulcer healing after two or four weeks of therapy. One hundred fifty-three patients with endoscopically documented active duodenal ulcer were studied. One hundred two patients received omeprazole and 51 received placebo. Patients in both groups were similar with regard to age, sex, duration of disease, initial ulcer size, smoking history, and alcohol use. A “per protocol” analysis of healing rates showed a significant advantage for omeprazole (P<0.01) at both week 2 (41% vs 13%) and week 4 (75% vs 27%). Concomitant factors (including smoking and ulcer size) did not alter the significance of the differences in healing rates between omeprazole and placebo. Complete relief of day and night pain was more often achieved (P<0.01) in the omeprazole group. “All-patients treated” analyses for healing and pain relief gave results similar to the respective “per protocol” analyses. Omeprazole was well tolerated; fewer patients had clinical and laboratory adverse experiences in the omeprazole group than in the placebo group. Fasting serum gastrin levels increased with omeprazole therapy (mean 34.9 to 73.5 pg/ml) but exceeded the normal range (>150 pg/ml) in only 12.3% of patients. Two weeks after therapy was stopped, serum gastrin levels showed a decrease toward baseline but had not yet completely returned to pretreatment levels (mean 49.7 pg/ml). Observations from Europe and Australia of >90% healing of duodenal ulcers after four weeks of omeprazole therapy were not confirmed in this study. No single factor explains this difference. Considerable variation in the degree of suppression of acid secretion has been demonstrated with the 20-mg daily dose of omeprazole; it is possible that, in US populations, a greater degree of antisecretory effect may be required to achieve the healing rates observed in Europe and Australia. In conclusion, omeprazole was more effective than placebo in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer, as determined by ulcer healing and relief of pain, and was well tolerated in the short-term treatment of patients with duodenal ulcer.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Two Different Doses of Omeprazole Versus Ranitidine in Treatment of Duodenal UlcersJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1986
- Effects of Omeprazole in Duodenal Ulcer PatientsScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1986
- Long-Term Acid Inhibitory Effect of Different Daily Doses of Omeprazole 24 Hours After DosingScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1986
- 20 versus 30 mg Omeprazole Once Daily: Effect on Healing Rates in 115 Duodenal Ulcer PatientsDigestion, 1986
- Effect of Omeprazole and Cimetidine on Duodenal UlcerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Double blind comparative study of omeprazole 10 mg and 30 mg daily for healing duodenal ulcers.BMJ, 1985
- Kurzzeit-Therapie des Ulcus duodeni mit Omeprazol und Ranitidin: Ergebnisse einer deutschen MultizenterstudieDeutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 1985
- The Rate of Healing of Duodenal Ulcers during Omeprazole TreatmentScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1985
- Omeprazole in duodenal ulceration: acid inhibition, symptom relief, endoscopic healing, and recurrence. Cooperative study.BMJ, 1984
- RAPID HEALING OF DUODENAL ULCERS WITH OMEPRAZOLE: DOUBLE-BLIND DOSE-COMPARATIVE TRIALThe Lancet, 1983