Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Vol. 60 (9) , 834-840
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4967(24)43382-7
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) ProjectJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- A comparison of different indices of responsivenessJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1997
- Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- The short form‐36 is preferable to the SIP as a generic health status measure in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplastyArthritis & Rheumatism, 1995
- The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hipArthritis & Rheumatism, 1991
- Signal measurement strategies: are they feasible and do they offer any advantage in outcome measurement in osteoarthritis?Arthritis & Rheumatism, 1990
- Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: Experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis indexSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1989
- A preliminary evaluation of the dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in osteoarthritis of the hip and kneeClinical Rheumatology, 1986
- Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis researchArthritis & Rheumatism, 1985