Feedback Processes in Sensitivity Training Groups
- 1 August 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 29 (8) , 763-782
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677602900805
Abstract
Characteristics of interpersonal feedback and responses to feedback, as a function of time (early versus later sessions), sender (trainers, male members, female members), and individual group, were studied in four NTL Bethel Tgroups. Over time, member feedback became more expressive and less focused upon here-and-now events, while trainer feedback became more nondirective. During early sessions, trainer feedback was less expressive, less focused upon self-other relationships, less here-and-now, more negative and confronting, more abstract, and more interpretive than member feedback, although these differences diminished by later sessions. No significant differences were apparent between male and female senders. Group differences outweighed their similarities. Acceptance versus rejection of member feedback was related only to the extent to which feedback was positive and supportive.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal1Journal of Social Issues, 1972
- Trainer Style and Patterns of Group DevelopmentThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
- Level of Emotional Arousal in Laboratory TrainingThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1969
- Phases, Roles, and Myths in Self-Analytic GroupsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968
- Trainer Self-Disclosure and Member Growth in Two T GroupsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968
- Trainer Interventions and Normative Patterns in the T GroupThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1966
- Developmental sequence in small groups.Psychological Bulletin, 1965
- Some notes on research on the role of models in the natural and social sciencesSynthese, 1948