Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Vol. 8 (2) , 4-17
- https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510086795
Abstract
Flesch, Fog and Lix readability formulas were used to measure 32 randomly selected chairmen′s address and footnote passages from the annual reports of some Hong Kong public companies for the years 1986 and 1991. Examines four issues: temporal change in readability levels, influence of industrial grouping on readability, and the relationship between corporate size or profitability on readability levels. Finds that readability is beyond the fluent comprehension levels of 90 per cent of the adult population, overall readability declined over the five‐year period; industrial classification has insignificant impact, and neither company size nor profitability are associated with improved readability levels. These Asian findings are consistent with those from similar studies in the USA, UK, Canada and New Zealand.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT AND CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCEAccounting & Finance, 1992
- Measuring the Readability of Business Writing: The Cloze Procedure Versus Readability FormulasInternational Journal of Business Communication, 1992
- Fry, Smog, Lix and Rix: Insinuations About Corporate Business CommunicationsInternational Journal of Business Communication, 1987
- Annual reports II: Readability of reports vs. business pressPublic Relations Review, 1984
- Annual reports I: Difficult reading and getting more soPublic Relations Review, 1984
- A NOTE ON AUDIT REPORT READABILITYAccounting & Finance, 1981
- A Methodology for Measuring the Understandability of Financial Report MessagesJournal of Accounting Research, 1979
- A Readability Survey of Technical and Popular LiteratureJournalism Quarterly, 1973
- The Fog Index After Twenty YearsJournal of Business Communication, 1969
- Validity of readability formulas.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953