THE HUNT FOR RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTAL REPORTS: DOCUMENT SEARCH AND EFFORTS FOR A ‘WHAT WORKS?’ META-ANALYSIS
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Crime and Justice
- Vol. 18 (2) , 63-80
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.1995.9721049
Abstract
One of the most important phases of a meta-analysis is the search and retrieval of primary research documents. In essence, this represents the data collection stage of any research review. The author presents a detailed discussion of the process involved in searching, locating and retrieving documents for a meta-analysis of crime reduction field experiments. The inclusion criteria, the rationale for the searches used, the problems encountered, and a detailed presentation of major techniques, including electronic technology, are discussed The article concludes with recommendations for future meta-analyses.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE GENE‐CRIME RELATIONSHIP*Criminology, 1992
- Families and Delinquency: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Broken HomesSocial Problems, 1991
- Decision rules for selecting effect sizes in meta-analysis: A review and reanalysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980sJustice Quarterly, 1987
- Analyzing meta-analysis: Potential problems, an unsuccessful replication, and evaluation criteria.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985
- Randomized Field Experiments for Program Planning, Development, and EvaluationEvaluation Quarterly, 1978
- Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of ResearchEducational Researcher, 1976
- Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- The Adult Female OffenderCorrectional Psychologist, 1974
- Correctional Outcome: An Evaluation of 100 ReportsThe Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1966