Relative merits of old and new indices of body mass with reference to skinfold thickness
Open Access
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 36 (4) , 697-699
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/36.4.697
Abstract
Correlation coefficients among the various commonly used indices of body mass and measures of skinfold thickness were calculated using 16,459 adult Black and white samples derived from the data sets of the US Health and Nutritional Examination Survey I of 1971 to 1974. Compared to weight and weight-height cube ratio, weight-height square ratio, and weight-heightp ratio exhibit the highest correlation with skinfold thickness. Furthermore, weight-height square ratio and weight-heightp ratio showed the same amount of correlation with skinfolds. Therefore, weight-heightp ratio is not the best indicator of adiposity. It is concluded that weight-height square ratio along with measures of subcutaneous fat such as skinfold thickness would provide adequate information about body size and body fatness. The applicability of weight-heightp is limited to studies concerned with interpopulation comparisons of body mass and where there are differences in height.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Grading body fatness from limited anthropometric dataThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1981
- Relative merits of the weight-corrected-for-height indicesThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1981
- Relationship of anthropometric measurements to body fat as determined by densitometry, potassium-40, and body waterThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1975
- Factors Affecting Body Density and Thickness of Subcutaneous FatThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1969
- THE TRICEPS SKINFOLD AS A PREDICTIVE MEASURE OF BODY DENSITY AND BODY FAT IN OBESE ADOLESCENT GIRLSPediatrics, 1965