Information in diabetes care: is there a need to dumb down even more?
- 22 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Diabetic Medicine
- Vol. 24 (5) , 561-563
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02135.x
Abstract
To assess readability of information provided for patients with Type 2 diabetes on drug treatment for their condition.A random sample of patient information on drug treatments published on the website of the main UK Diabetes charity was assessed for readability using two accepted measures and compared with articles from three national newspapers published the same day, in the setting of a hospital-based diabetes centre. The main outcome measures were Flesch-Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores available within Microsoft Office 2000.Information provided for patients and medically related articles from two of three newspapers had suboptimal readability, requiring literacy skills well above the UK average.Information for patients with diabetes may be of limited value for 20% of the UK adult population who have problems with literacy.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2006
- Glucagon-like peptide-1: from extract to agent. The Claude Bernard Lecture, 2005Diabetologia, 2006
- British Internet-Derived Patient Information on Diabetes Mellitus: Is It Readable?Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2005
- Adherence to prescribed oral hypoglycaemic medication in a population of patients with Type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort studyDiabetic Medicine, 2002
- Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted PersonnelPublished by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ,1975
- A new readability yardstick.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948