When Should the Third Renal Transplant Rejection Episode be Treated?
- 1 July 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 186 (1) , 104-110
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197707000-00015
Abstract
Recent reports cite better survival when repeatedly rejecting renal allografts are removed and patients are returned to hemodialysis. The criteria for graft removal remain undefined, although some reports recommend removing all kidneys undergoing a 3rd rejection. In this series (1968-1973) of 316 patients with technically successful 1st grafts followed 2.5-8 yr, graft survival was inversely related to the number of rejection episodes. Of the kidneys without rejection, 100% are currently functioning or functioned at the time of death compared to 90% with 1 rejection, 67.4% with 2 and 21% with 3. However, 40% of kidneys having 3 rejection episodes functioned longer than 1 yr after treatment of the 3rd rejection episode. In an attempt to determine the predictability of 1 yr graft survival or failure following treatment of the 3rd rejection, a formula was developed that correctly predicted the outcome in 33 of 38 (87%) patients. The formula was based on information available prior to treatment of the 3rd rejection episode, and represents an index of baseline renal function (serum creatinine after the 2nd rejection episode) and 2 indices of the severity of rejection episodes (serum creatinine change between the 1st and 2nd rejection episodes; rapidity of sequential rejection). Following its derivation, the formula was applied to a 2nd group (1974) of 19 patients having had 3 rejection episodes. The formula correctly predicted 1 yr allograft survival or failure following treatment of the 3rd rejection episode in 68% of these patients. A striking finding of this review was a significant difference in current patient survival between those having no rejection episodes (89%) and those having 1 or more rejection episodes (65%) (P < .00001). There was no significantly greater long-term curtailment in survival if more than 1 rejection episode was treated. Patients having 1 rejection episode seemed to die from various causes and at various time periods. Patients dying after 2 or more rejection episodes had an increased incidence of deaths due to bacterial infection.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Seven Yearsʼ Experience with Antilymphoblast Globulin for Renal Transplantation From Cadaver DonorsAnnals of Surgery, 1976
- Factors Related to Success or Failure of Second Renal TransplantsAnnals of Surgery, 1976
- Improved patient survival in renal transplantation.1976
- Treatment of Chronic Renal Failure by Transplantation and DisalysisAnnals of Surgery, 1975
- Kidney TransplantationAnnals of Surgery, 1974
- Survival of Patients Undergoing Chronic Hemodialysis and Renal TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1973
- Pulmonary Complications in Transplant RecipientsArchives of Surgery, 1972
- Prevention of death after renal transplantation: I. Recognizable patterns leading to death in long-term survivorsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1970
- The Period and Nature of Hazard in Clinical Renal TransplantationAnnals of Surgery, 1969