Comparing the toxicity of two drugs in the framework of spontaneous reporting: A confidence interval approach
- 31 January 1996
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 49 (1) , 121-123
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00537-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- EURO-ADR: Pharmacovigilance and research. A European perspectivePharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 1992
- Power and weakness of spontaneous reporting: A probabilistic approachJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Vs Event Monitoring: A ComparisonJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1991
- Stimulating reporting of adverse drug reactions by using a fee.BMJ, 1990
- Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1990
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and serious gastrointestinal adverse reactions--2.BMJ, 1986
- Testing Statistical HypothesesPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- IS BETTER FEEDBACK A MAJOR STIMULUS TO SPONTANEOUS ADVERSE REACTION MONITORING?The Lancet, 1984
- CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON THE RATIO OF TWO POISSON VARIABLESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1974