What Can Behavior Analysis Learn From the Aversives Controversy?
- 1 October 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in The Behavior Analyst
- Vol. 14 (2) , 187-196
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392569
Abstract
The paper argues that behavior analysis may have contributed to the aversives controversy in a number of ways. The role that the field has played and the lessons that may be learned are discussed in the areas of research, training, and politics.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Model for Developing and Evaluating Behavioral TechnologyPublished by Springer Nature ,1993
- The role of the AAMR in the aversives controversy.1989
- Developing Behavior Analysis at the State LevelThe Behavior Analyst, 1987
- Nurturing Behavioral Repertoires Within a Nonsupportive EnvironmentThe Behavior Analyst, 1983
- Stimulus overselectivity in autism: A review of research.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- Stimulus overselectivity in autism: A review of research.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- Reducing stimulus overselectivity in autistic childrenJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1977
- Overselectivity, developmental level, and overtraining in autistic and normal childrenJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1976
- THE ELIMINATION OF AUTISTIC SELF‐STIMULATORY BEHAVIOR BY OVERCORRECTION1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973
- Punishment of human behavior.American Psychologist, 1972