Choosing Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients With Multivessel Disease

This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:

• Disease-Specific Health Status After Stent-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
  Circulation, 2003
• Relative Cost Comparison of Treatments for Coronary Artery Disease: The First Year Follow-Up of MASS II Study
  Circulation, 2003
• Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter, randomized trial
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
• Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel Disease
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
• Argentine randomized study: coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple-vessel disease (ERACI II): 30-day and one-year follow-up results
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
• Comparison of Coronary Bypass Surgery with Angioplasty in Patients with Multivessel Disease
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
• First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation)
  The Lancet, 1995
• A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass Surgery
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1994
• A Randomized Study of Coronary Angioplasty Compared with Bypass Surgery in Patients with Symptomatic Multivessel Coronary Disease
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1994
• Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): In-hospital results and 1-year follow-up
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993