Progression Risk, Urinary Protein Excretion, and Treatment Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Nondiabetic Kidney Disease
Open Access
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Vol. 18 (6) , 1959-1965
- https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2006101081
Abstract
It is unclear whether patients with nondiabetic kidney disease benefit from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) therapy when they are at low risk for disease progression or when they have low urinary protein excretion. With the use of a combined database from 11 randomized, clinical trials (n = 1860), a Cox proportional hazards model, based on known predictors of risk and the composite outcome kidney failure or creatinine doubling, was developed and used to stratify patients into equal-sized quartiles of risk. Outcome risk and treatment effect were examined across various risk strata. Use of this risk model for targeting ACEI therapy was also compared with a strategy based on urinary protein excretion alone. Control patients in the highest quartile of predicted risk had an annualized outcome rate of 28.7%, whereas control patients in the lowest quartile of predicted risk had an annualized outcome rate of 0.4%. Despite the extreme variation in risk, there was no variation in the degree of benefit of ACEI therapy (P = 0.93 for the treatment × risk interaction). Significant interaction was detected between baseline urine protein and ACEI therapy (P = 0.003). When patients were stratified according to their baseline urinary protein excretion, among the subgroup of patients with proteinuria ≥500 mg/d, significant treatment effect was seen across all patients with a measurable outcome risk, including those at relatively low risk (1.7% annualized risk for progression). However, there was no benefit of ACEI therapy among patients with proteinuria <500 mg/d, even among higher risk patients (control outcome rate 19.7%). Patients with nondiabetic kidney disease vary considerably in their risk for disease progression, but the treatment effect of ACEI does not vary across risk strata. Patients with proteinuria <500 mg/d do not seem to benefit, even when at relatively high risk for progression.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Detection of Progressive Chronic Kidney DiseaseJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2006
- ACE-inhibitor use and the long-term risk of renal failure in diabetesKidney International, 2006
- Reporting Clinical Trial Results To Inform Providers, Payers, And ConsumersHealth Affairs, 2005
- From subgroups to individuals: general principles and the example of carotid endarterectomyThe Lancet, 2005
- Chronic Kidney Disease Awareness, Prevalence, and Trends among U.S. Adults, 1999 to 2000Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2005
- Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme Inhibition in Stable Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Update on C-reactive protein as a risk marker in cardiovascular diseaseKidney International, 2003
- Renoprotective properties of ACE-inhibition in non-diabetic nephropathies with non-nephrotic proteinuriaThe Lancet, 1999
- ACE Inhibition Preserves Renal Function Better thanbT-blockade in the Treatment of Essential HypertensionBlood Pressure, 1995
- Long-term comparison between captopril and nifedipine in the progression of renal insufficiencyKidney International, 1992