Why aren’t foamy viruses pathogenic?
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Microbiology
- Vol. 8 (6) , 284-289
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01763-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sites of Simian Foamy Virus Persistence in Naturally Infected African Green Monkeys: Latent Provirus Is Ubiquitous, Whereas Viral Replication Is Restricted to the Oral MucosaVirology, 1999
- Cells Expressing the Human Foamy Virus (HFV) Accessory Bet Protein Are Resistant to Productive HFV SuperinfectionVirology, 1998
- Long-Term Persistent Infection of Domestic Rabbits by the Human Foamy VirusVirology, 1997
- No Evidence of Antibody to Human Foamy Virus in Widespread Human PopulationsAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 1996
- Cell tropism of the simian foamy virus type 1 (SFV‐1)Journal of Medical Primatology, 1996
- Markers of Foamy Virus Infections in Monkeys, Apes, and Accidentally Infected Humans: Appropriate Testing Fails to Confirm Suspected Foamy Virus Prevalence in HumansAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 1995
- Isolation, Cloning, and Sequencing of Simian Foamy Viruses from Chimpanzees (SFVcpz): High Homology to Human Foamy Virus (HFV)Virology, 1994
- Transient immunosuppressive effect induced in rabbits and mice by the human spumaretrovirus prototype HFV (human foamy virus)Research in Virology, 1993
- Simian Foamy Virus Type 3 (SFV-3) in Latently Infected Vero Cells: Reactivation by Demethylation of Proviral DNAVirology, 1993
- Isolations and serology of bovine spumavirusAustralian Veterinary Journal, 1983