Editorial: Laparoscopic Urological Surgery: Differentiating What Should Be Done from What Can Be Done
- 1 June 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 151 (6) , 1603-1604
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35313-2
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting the risk of lymph node involvement using the pre-treatment prostate specific antigen and gleason score in men with clinically localized prostate cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1994
- Selection of patients for laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy prior to radical prostatectomy: A decision analysisUrology, 1993
- The Use of Prostate Specific Antigen, Clinical Stage and Gleason Score to Predict Pathological Stage in Men with Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1993
- Mini-laparotomy staging pelvic lymphadenectomy (minilap) Alternative to standard and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomyUrology, 1993
- Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for Clinical Stage a Testis Cancer (1965 to 1989): Modifications of Technique and Impact on EjaculationJournal of Urology, 1993
- Lower Incidence of Unsuspected Lymph Node Metastases in 521 Consecutive Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1992
- Prognostic factors in clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: multivariate analysis of a prospective multicenter study. Swedish-Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990