Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research
Open Access
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Medical Journals Sweden AB in Acta Orthopaedica
- Vol. 69 (3) , 224-229
- https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809000920
Abstract
(1998). Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica: Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 224-229.This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Science indicators derived from databasesScientometrics, 1996
- Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematicsScientometrics, 1996
- Bibliometric performance measuresScientometrics, 1996
- The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part II. Life sciencesScientometrics, 1995
- Measure for Measure in ScienceScience, 1993
- Drawbacks of peer reviewNature, 1993
- National citationsNature, 1990
- Effects of disciplines and countries on citation habits. An analysis of empirical papers in behavioural sciencesScientometrics, 1985
- The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field- and time-dependent factors to be consideredScientometrics, 1985
- Chance and Consensus in Peer ReviewScience, 1981