Assay-Assisted Treatment Selection for Women with Breast or Ovarian Cancer
- 1 January 2003
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 161, 126-145
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19022-3_12
Abstract
Although women suffering from advanced cancer of the breast or ovary are unlikely to be cured, several active agents are available that can prolong their lives. The use of these agents is based on demonstrated benefit in large randomized clinical trials, and the clinical activity of these chemotherapy regimens is initially high, with 60%–70% of patients responding. Unfortunately, their benefit in the second-line setting is often limited, with less than 30% of patients showing significant disease response. Thus some 70% of patients may undergo ineffective treatment during the course of their disease, while still suffering from significant chemotherapy-related toxicity. Having some foreknowledge of a given agent’s expected result before its administration would therefore benefit the individual patient. In vitro drug response testing, first developed to assist in the selection of antibiotics for patients with bacterial infections, has recently been demonstrated to accurately predict how cancer patients will respond to chemotherapy. This review discusses the historical development of in vitro testing for cancer patients, some of the pitfalls encountered, and offers an assessment of their current utility. Results of various clinical trials that evaluated correlations between in vitro tumor response and clinical outcomes are described. These data suggest that in vitro drug response assays can accurately predict drug resistance and can identify patients who are more or less likely to benefit from a given agent.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2001CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2001
- Correlation of the clinical response to chemotherapy in breast cancer with ex vivo chemosensitivityAnti-Cancer Drugs, 1996
- Cyclophosphamide and Cisplatin Compared with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients with Stage III and Stage IV Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Predictive Value of the Fluorescent Cytoprint Assay (FCA): A Retrospective Correlation Study of In Vitro Chemosensitivity and Individual Responses to ChemotherapyCancer Investigation, 1991
- Synergistic Activity of Suramin With Tumor Necrosis Factor and Doxorubicin on Human Prostate Cancer Cell LinesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1990
- A Critical Appraisal of the Human Tumor Stem-Cell AssayNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- IN-VITRO CLONOGENIC ASSAY FOR PREDICTING RESPONSE OF OVARIAN CANCER TO CHEMOTHERAPYThe Lancet, 1980
- Quantitation of Differential Sensitivity of Human-Tumor Stem Cells to Anticancer DrugsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Primary Bioassay of Human Tumor Stem CellsScience, 1977
- Bacterial Growth Rate in the Sea: Direct Analysis by Thymidine AutoradiographyScience, 1967