No Foot in the Door
- 29 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Aging & Social Policy
- Vol. 10 (4) , 5-23
- https://doi.org/10.1300/j031v10n04_02
Abstract
Pairs of testers, one aged 57 and one aged 32, applied for 102 entry-level sales or management jobs in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area. Although their credentials described them as equally qualified, the older applicants received less favorable responses from employers 41.2% of the time. Three quarters of these differences occurred before older applicants could fully present their qualifications. The negative employer assumptions about older workers implied by these differences in outcome were seldom explicitly stated.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Employment Discrimination Against Older WorkersJournal of Aging & Social Policy, 1997
- Age Discrimination, Job Separations, and Employment Status of Older Workers: Evidence from Self-ReportsThe Journal of Human Resources, 1997
- The employee selection interview: A fresh look at an old problemHuman Resource Management, 1996
- Measuring Employment Discrimination through Controlled ExperimentsThe Review of Black Political Economy, 1994
- Do Job Opportunities Decline with Age?ILR Review, 1988
- AGE DISCRIMINATION AND PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY: A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS OF THE LEGAL LITERATURE WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCHPersonnel Psychology, 1984
- Ageism in the Labor Market: Estimating Earnings Discrimination Against Older WorkersJournal of Gerontology, 1983
- THE ROLE OF PUBLIC PROGRAMS AND PRIVATE MARKETS IN REEMPLOYING DISPLACED WORKERSReview of Policy Research, 1983
- Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor MarketsILR Review, 1977
- The nature of job-related age stereotypes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976