Randomised double blind trial of etoricoxib and indometacin in treatment of acute gouty arthritis
- 22 June 2002
- Vol. 324 (7352) , 1488-1492
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7352.1488
Abstract
Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of etoricoxib, a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor, in comparison with indometacin in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis. Design: Randomised, double blind, active comparator controlled trial. Setting: 43 outpatient study centres in 11 countries. Participants: 142 men and eight women (75 patients per treatment group) aged 18 years or over presenting with clinically diagnosed acute gout within 48 hours of onset. Interventions: Etoricoxib 120 mg administered orally once daily versus indometacin 50 mg administered orally three times daily, both for 8 days Main outcome measures: Patients' assessment of pain in the study joint over days 2 to 5 (primary end point); investigators' and patients' global assessments of response to treatment and tenderness of the study joint (key secondary end points). Results: Etoricoxib showed efficacy comparable to indometacin. Patients' assessment of pain in the study joint (0-4 point Likert scale, “no pain” to “extreme pain”) over days 2 to 5 showed a least squares mean change from baseline of −1.72 (95% confidence interval −1.90 to −1.55) for etoricoxib and −1.83 (−2.01 to −1.65) for indometacin. The difference between treatment groups met prespecified comparability criteria. All other efficacy end points, including those reflecting reduction in inflammation and analgesia, provided corroborative evidence of comparable efficacy. Significant pain relief was evident at the first measurement, 4 hours after the first dose of treatment. Prespecified safety analyses revealed that drug related adverse experiences occurred significantly less frequently with etoricoxib (22.7%) than with indometacin (46.7%) (P=0.003), although overall adverse experience rates were similar between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: Etoricoxib 120 mg once daily provides rapid and effective treatment for acute gouty arthritis comparable to indometacin 50 mg three times daily. Etoricoxib was generally safe and well tolerated in this study.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Celecoxib versus diclofenac in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee: A placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind comparisonScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 2001
- Comparison of rofecoxib and celecoxib, two cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, in postoperative dental pain: A randomized, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled clinical trialClinical Therapeutics, 1999
- How well have diagnostic tests and therapies for gout been evaluated?Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 1999
- Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Intramuscular Ketorolac and Oral Indomethacin in the Treatment of Acute Gouty ArthritisAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- Comparison of parenteral adrenocorticotropic hormone with oral indomethacin in the treatment of acute goutArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988
- Observations on spontaneous improvement in patients with podagra: implications for therapeutic trials of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1987
- Flurbiprofen in the treatment of acute gout: A comparison with indomethacinThe American Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Treatment of Acute Gouty Arthritis with Proquazone and Indomethacin: A Comparative, Double-blind TrialScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1978
- Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary goutArthritis & Rheumatism, 1977
- Further experience with indomethacin in the treatment of rheumatic disorders.BMJ, 1966