The Optimal Concentration of Creditors
- 16 September 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 60 (5) , 2193-2212
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00796.x
Abstract
Our model assumes that creditors need to expend resources to collect on claims. Consequently, because diffuse creditors suffer from mutual free‐riding (Holmstrom (1982)), they fare worse than concentrated creditors (e.g., a house bank). The model predicts that measures of debt concentration relate positively to creditors' (aggregate) debt collection expenditures and positively to management's chosen expenditures to resist paying. However, collection activity is purely redistributive, so social waste is larger when creditors are concentrated. If borrower quality is not known, the best firms choose the most concentrated creditors and pay higher expected yields.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The choice among bank debt, non-bank private debt, and public debt: evidence from new corporate borrowingsJournal of Financial Economics, 2003
- Trade Credit and Credit RationingThe Review of Financial Studies, 1997
- Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the FirmThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997
- Investment Policy and Exit-Exchange Offers Within Financially Distressed FirmsThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Optimal Debt Structure and the Number of CreditorsJournal of Political Economy, 1996
- An Incomplete Contracts Approach to Financial ContractingThe Review of Economic Studies, 1992
- Equilibrium loan pricing under the bank-client relationshipJournal of Banking & Finance, 1989
- Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and LiquidityJournal of Political Economy, 1983
- Moral Hazard in TeamsThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1982
- Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the CorporationThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1980