WHAT MOTIVATES GOING PRIVATE?: AN ANALYSIS OF AUSTRALIAN FIRMS
- 1 May 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Accounting & Finance
- Vol. 36 (1) , 31-50
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629x.1996.tb00297.x
Abstract
We investigate going private transactions in Australia between 1988 and 1991. Approximately ten percent of all takeovers during this period are instances of going private. In contrast to studies of similar transactions in the United States, we find no direct evidence to support a free cash flow explanation for going private, although going private is frequently preceded by the threat of a takeover offer. However, the free cash flow explanation for going private may not be applicable in Pacific Basin countries where exchange‐traded investment activity is in relatively high growth sectors and foreign ownership accounts for a large part of those investment sectors where managerial abuse of free cash flow has been alleged.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivities: Constrained versus Unconstrained FirmsThe Journal of Finance, 2004
- The effects of management buyouts on operating performance and valuePublished by Elsevier ,2002
- A test of the free cash flow hypothesis: The case of bidder returnsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeoversPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control SystemsThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- The Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow: Acquisition Activity and Equity IssuesThe Journal of Business, 1991
- Consequences of leveraged buyoutsJournal of Financial Economics, 1990
- Management BuyoutsColumbia Law Review, 1985
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Determinants of corporate borrowingJournal of Financial Economics, 1977