Disclosure ofAPOEGenotype for Risk of Alzheimer's Disease
Top Cited Papers
- 16 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 361 (3) , 245-254
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0809578
Abstract
The apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype provides information on the risk of Alzheimer's disease, but the genotyping of patients and their family members has been discouraged. We examined the effect of genotype disclosure in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. We randomly assigned 162 asymptomatic adults who had a parent with Alzheimer's disease to receive the results of their own APOE genotyping (disclosure group) or not to receive such results (nondisclosure group). We measured symptoms of anxiety, depression, and test-related distress 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after disclosure or nondisclosure. There were no significant differences between the two groups in changes in time-averaged measures of anxiety (4.5 in the disclosure group and 4.4 in the nondisclosure group, P=0.84), depression (8.8 and 8.7, respectively; P=0.98), or test-related distress (6.9 and 7.5, respectively; P=0.61). Secondary comparisons between the nondisclosure group and a disclosure subgroup of subjects carrying the APOE ε4 allele (which is associated with increased risk) also revealed no significant differences. However, the ε4-negative subgroup had a significantly lower level of test-related distress than did the ε4-positive subgroup (P=0.01). Subjects with clinically meaningful changes in psychological outcomes were distributed evenly among the nondisclosure group and the ε4-positive and ε4-negative subgroups. Baseline scores for anxiety and depression were strongly associated with post-disclosure scores of these measures (PAPOE genotyping results to adult children of patients with Alzheimer's disease did not result in significant short-term psychological risks. Test-related distress was reduced among those who learned that they were APOE ε4–negative. Persons with high levels of emotional distress before undergoing genetic testing were more likely to have emotional difficulties after disclosure. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00571025.)Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk communication strategies: state of the art and effectiveness in the context of cancer genetic servicesEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Genomic profiling to promote a healthy lifestyle: not ready for prime timeNature Genetics, 2003
- A vision for the future of genomics researchNature, 2003
- Reasons for Seeking Genetic Susceptibility Testing Among First-Degree Relatives of People With Alzheimer DiseaseAlzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 2003
- Differences Between African Americans and Whites in Their Attitudes Toward Genetic Testing for Alzheimer's DiseaseGenetic Testing, 2003
- Predicting adaptation to presymptomatic DNA testing for late onset disorders: who will experience distress? Rotterdam Leiden Genetics Workgroup.Journal of Medical Genetics, 1998
- Correlates of psychologic distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer.Health Psychology, 1997
- Examining scale discriminability in the BDI and CES-D as a function of depressive severity.Psychological Assessment, 1995
- Impact of Event Scale: A cross-validation study and some empirical evidence supporting a conceptual model of stress response syndromes.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1982
- The CES-D ScaleApplied Psychological Measurement, 1977