Evaluation of the BDProbeTec strand displacement amplification assay in comparison with the AMTD II direct test for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Microbiology & Infection
- Vol. 10 (4) , 332-334
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1198-743x.2004.00818.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance Assessment of Two Commercial Amplification Assays for Direct Detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosisComplex from Respiratory and Extrapulmonary SpecimensJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- An evaluation of the BD ProbeTec ET system for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory samplesJournal of Medical Microbiology, 2002
- Changing Approaches to the Diagnosis of TuberculosisAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- Diagnostic Standards and Classification of Tuberculosis in Adults and ChildrenAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2000
- The dynamics of repeated elements: Applications to the epidemiology of tuberculosisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000
- Global Burden of TuberculosisJAMA, 1999
- Differences in the prevalence of IS6110 insertion sites in Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains: low and high copy number of IS6110Tubercle and Lung Disease, 1998
- Rapid diagnostic tests for tuberculosis: what is the appropriate use? American Thoracic Society Workshop.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1997
- Comparison of the Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) Direct Test, Amplicor MTB PCR, and IS6110-PCR for Detection of MTB in Respiratory SpecimensClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Clinical efficacy of the amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1996