The Correlation Among Patients and Health Care Professionals in Assessing Functional Status Using the Karnofsky and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scales
- 31 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Supportive Cancer Therapy
- Vol. 2 (1) , 59-63
- https://doi.org/10.3816/sct.2004.n.024
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance status score: do patients and their oncologists agree?British Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Prognostic value of performance status assessed by patients themselves, nurses and oncologists in advanced non-small cell lung cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Observer error in grading performance status in cancer patientsSupportive Care in Cancer, 1999
- Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: A prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institutionEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1996
- Performance status assessment in cancer patients. An inter-observer variability studyBritish Journal of Cancer, 1993
- Intra and interobserver variability in cancer patients' performance status assessed according to Karnofsky and ECOG scalesAnnals of Oncology, 1991
- Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?British Journal of Cancer, 1988