Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments
- 15 August 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Hydrological Processes
- Vol. 14 (11-12) , 2157-2172
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(20000815/30)14:11/12<2157::aid-hyp57>3.0.co;2-s
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural networkPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Neurohydrology: implementation options and a research agendaArea, 1999
- River flood forecasting with a neural network modelWater Resources Research, 1999
- An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modellingHydrological Sciences Journal, 1998
- Comment on “The use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality parameters” by H. R. Maier and G. C. DandyWater Resources Research, 1997
- Artificial Neural Network Modeling of the Rainfall‐Runoff ProcessWater Resources Research, 1995
- ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS: A NEW APPROACH TO MODELING INTERREGIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION FLOWS*Journal of Regional Science, 1994
- Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximatorsNeural Networks, 1989
- Sensitivity analysis of the Systeme Hydrologique Europeen for an upland catchmentJournal of Hydrology, 1986
- A procedure for the selection of objective functions for hydrologic simulation modelsJournal of Hydrology, 1977