The Relative Stability of Personality Measures Compared with Diagnostic Measures
- 1 July 1959
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in Journal of Mental Science
- Vol. 105 (440) , 783-787
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.105.440.783
Abstract
In previous investigations (Foulds and Caine, 1958 and 1959) psychoneurotic subjects were classified in terms of the presenting syndrome (Hysteria or Dysthymia) and of the personality type (hysteroid or obsessive) as rated by psychiatrists. It was found that some psychological test measurements differentiated between Hysterics and Dysthymics regardless of personality type; whilst other measures differentiated between hysteroid and obsessive personalities regardless of diagnosis. The successful measures were not, however, identical for men and women. It was argued that one of the advantages of this double classificatory system should be that we would have one set of measures—the diagnostic—which should vary with the patient's clinical condition and another set—the personality measures—which should remain relatively constant.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hysterics and dysthymics as criterion groups in the study of introversion-extraversion.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958
- Psychoneurotic Symptom Clusters, Trait Clusters and Psychological TestsJournal of Mental Science, 1958
- PERSONALITY FACTORS AND RATE OF CONDITIONINGBritish Journal of Psychology, 1957
- Conditioning and personality: A study of normal and neurotic subjects.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956