Recruitment to publicly funded trials — Are surgical trials really different?
Open Access
- 30 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 29 (5) , 631-634
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2008.02.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The challenge of recruiting patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee into a randomized clinical trial comparing surgical and non-surgical treatmentContemporary Clinical Trials, 2007
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Treatment of Patients With Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: One-Year Follow-UpSurgical Innovation, 2006
- What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agenciesTrials, 2006
- Recruitment index as a measure of patient recruitment activity in clinical trialsContemporary Clinical Trials, 2005
- Open Mesh versus Laparoscopic Mesh Repair of Inguinal HerniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Perspectives of Evidence-Based SurgeryDigestive Surgery, 2003
- Late-starter sites in randomized controlled trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutionsBMJ, 2002
- The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsuturedBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- Surgical practice is evidence basedBritish Journal of Surgery, 1997