Determining Inhibition
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by Hogrefe Publishing Group in Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 51 (4) , 290-299
- https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.51.4.290
Abstract
The current experiment assessed the relation between inhibitory mechanisms underlying language processing in working memory (WM) and the influence of a postulated internal cognitive trade-off between lexicon and context factors driving inhibition in sentence processing. Participants with high and low WM span ( Daneman & Carpenter, 1980 ) were presented with sentences that began with an ambiguous noun (being both homographic and homophonic). A cue towards the relevant meaning of the ambiguous word was presented three words later by another noun. Immediately after the cue, a verb was presented that finally disambiguated the ambiguous noun. In half of the cases, the final disambiguation was congruent with the disambiguation cue. In the other half, subjects had to realize that it was not the cued but the other meaning, which turned out to be relevant in the actual sentence. This experimental paradigm was identical to the one used in Gunter et al. (2003 ). In contrast to the original experiment, the filler items in the present study were unambiguous. Both groups showed a smaller N400 component for the cue related to the dominant as compared to the subordinate meaning, suggesting that the dominant meaning was more active in WM than the subordinate one. In the original experiment, only the high-span subjects manifested this effect. Thus, a change in the global experimental setting changed the use of WM-related inhibitory processes. Data also suggest that, as a default strategy, the lexicon-context trade-off of high-span subjects relies more on lexicon information than does that of low-span subjects.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Working Memory and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution as Revealed by ERPs: A Difficult Case for Activation TheoriesJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2003
- Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Lexical Processing: Open-and Closed-Class WordsJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1999
- Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responsesBiological Psychology, 1998
- Neural plasticity in the dynamics of human visual word recognitionNeuroscience Letters, 1998
- Visual and auditory working memory capacityTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 1998
- Variation in the latencies and amplitudes of N400 and NA as a function of semantic primingPsychophysiology, 1995
- Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in ReadingJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1995
- A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review, 1992
- American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position NomenclatureJournal Of Clinical Neurophysiology, 1991
- Individual differences in working memory and readingJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980