The degree of severity of heteroskedasticity and the traditional goldfeld and quandt pretest estimator
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation
- Vol. 19 (3) , 827-836
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610919008812890
Abstract
The traditional Goldfeld and Quandt heteroskedasticity pretesting methodology disregards the fact that even though heteroskedasticity may exist, its degree of severity might be such that the OLS estimator would still outperform the 2SAE. It, therefore, produces results inferior to the OLS estimator when the degree of severity of heteroskedasticity is very mild. This paper through Monte Carlo simulations shows that the probabilistic pretesting procedure suggested by Adjibolosoo (1989) is more powerful than the traditional Goldfeld and Quandt heteroskedasticity pretesting methodology at the usual traditionally selected levels of significanceKeywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Finite Sample Moments of a Preliminary Test Estimator in the Case of Possible HeteroscedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- The Heteroscedastic Linear Model: Exact Finite Sample ResultsEconometrica, 1978
- Small Sample Properties of a Class of Two Stage Aitken EstimatorsEconometrica, 1977
- A comparison of the power of some tests for heteroskedasticity in the general linear modelJournal of Econometrics, 1974
- Some Tests for HomoscedasticityJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1965