Differential effect of muscle vibration on intracortical inhibitory circuits in humans
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 551 (2) , 649-660
- https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.043752
Abstract
Low amplitude muscle vibration (0.5 ms; 80 Hz; duration 1.5 s) was applied in turn to each of three different intrinsic hand muscles (first dorsal interosseus, FDI; abductor pollicis brevis, APB; and abductor digiti minimi, ADM) in order to test its effect on the EMG responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Recordings were also taken from flexor and extensor carpi radialis (FCR and ECR, respectively). We evaluated the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by a single TMS pulse, short interval intracortical inhibition and facilitation (SICI and ICF) and long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). TMS pulses were applied 1 s after the start of vibration with subjects relaxed throughout. Vibration increased the amplitude of MEPs evoked in the vibrated muscle (162 ± 6 % of MEP with no vibration; mean ±s.e.m.), but suppressed MEPs in the two non‐vibrated hand muscles (72 ± 9 %). Compared with no vibration (test response reduced to 51 ± 5 % of control), there was less SICI in the vibrated muscle (test response reduced to 92 ± 28 % of control) and more in the non‐vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 27 ± 5 % of control). The opposite occurred for LICI: compared with the no vibration condition (test response reduced to 33 ± 6 % control), there was more LICI in the vibrated muscle (test response reduced to 17 ± 3 % control) than in the non‐vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 80 ± 11 % control) even when the intensity of the test stimulus was adjusted to compensate for the changes in baseline MEP. There was no effect on ICF. Cutaneous stimulation of the index finger (80 Hz, 1.5 s duration, twice sensory threshold) had no consistent differential effect on any of the parameters. We conclude that vibratory input from muscle can differentially modulate excitability in motor cortical circuits.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Short‐interval paired‐pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensityThe Journal of Physiology, 2002
- Effects of peripheral sensory input on cortical inhibition in humansThe Journal of Physiology, 2002
- Short latency inhibition of human hand motor cortex by somatosensory input from the handThe Journal of Physiology, 2000
- GABAB receptor-mediated effects in human and rat neocortical neurones in vitroNeuropharmacology, 1999
- Inhibitory action of forearm flexor muscle afferents on corticospinal outputs to antagonist muscles in humansThe Journal of Physiology, 1998
- Idiopathic focal dystonia: a disorder of muscle spindle afferent processing?Brain, 1997
- Proprioceptive sensory codes mediating movement trajectory perception: human hand vibration-induced drawing illusionsCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 1995
- What is area 3a?Brain Research Reviews, 1980