Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices
Open Access
- 16 September 2009
- Vol. 339 (sep16 3) , b3450
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3450
Abstract
Objective To examine why patients from ethnic minorities give poorer evaluations of primary health care than white patients.Design Cross sectional analysis of patient surveys collected in general practice. Setting 1098 English general practices that undertook a routine survey of patients using the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire between April 2005 and March 2006.Participants 188 572 survey respondents, 95.8% of whom identified themselves as “white,” “black/black British,” “Asian/Asian British,” or “Chinese.” Analyses were restricted to between 133 441 (71%) and 147 686 (78%) respondents with complete data on relevant variables.Main outcome measures Patient evaluations of waiting times for general practitioner appointments, time spent waiting in surgeries for consultations to start, and continuity of care.Results All aspects of care were rated substantially lower by respondents from the three ethnic minority groups than by white patients. Poorer evaluations of time spent waiting for consultations to begin (rated lowest by Asian patients) and continuity of care (rated lowest by Chinese patients) appeared to reflect worse reported experiences by ethnic minority groups. Substantial differences between white and ethnic minority patients’ ratings of appointment waiting times persisted, however, even after adjusting for the actual time patients reported waiting. This effect disappeared for Chinese and black respondents after adjusting for evaluations of reception staff and doctors’ communication skills, but Asian patients’ ratings remained considerably lower than those of white respondents.Conclusions Important differences in assessments of care exist in different ethnic minority groups. Some negative evaluations may reflect communication issues. Among Asian patients, lower ratings of waiting times for appointments may also reflect different expectations of care. Adjusting survey results for ethnicity may be justified when comparing healthcare providers; however, health services also have a responsibility to meet legitimate patient expectations.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medicine and public health in a multiethnic worldJournal of Public Health, 2009
- Users' reports and evaluations of out-of-hours health care and the UK national quality requirements: a cross sectional studyBritish Journal of General Practice, 2009
- Physician Effects on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Patients’ Experiences of Primary CareJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Factors associated with enablement in general practice: cross-sectional study using routinely-collected dataBritish Journal of General Practice, 2008
- What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients' PrioritiesAnnals of Family Medicine, 2008
- The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) – Development and psychometric characteristicsBMC Family Practice, 2008
- Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional studyBMJ, 2006
- Patients' Preferences for Technical versus Interpersonal Quality When Selecting a Primary Care PhysicianHealth Services Research, 2005
- Linking Physicians' Pay to the Quality of Care — A Major Experiment in the United KingdomNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Users’ understanding of medical knowledge in general practiceSocial Science & Medicine, 2002