The Computer-Assisted Literature Review
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Social Science Micro Review
- Vol. 2 (3) , 137-151
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089443938600200303
Abstract
This paper describes several techniques for using computers to assist with literature reviews. It identifies various literature review tasks, then discusses how existing programs can be used to address them. Programs discussed include word processors, qualitative analysis programs, content analysis programs, file management systems, database management systems, spreadsheets, and statistical programs. The paper concludes that judicious use of existing programs offers a powerful means to transform the literature review from a burdensome task resulting in a quickly outdated product to a more manageable task producing a product that is flexible, cumulative, and better able to cope with the rapid growth of knowledge.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methods for Integrative ReviewsReview of Educational Research, 1980
- Statistical Methods for Summarizing Independent Correlational ResultsJournal of Educational Statistics, 1980
- Differential and single-group validity of employment tests by race: A critical analysis of three recent studies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- The effect of individual differences of cognitive style on judgments of document relevanceJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1977
- Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review systemCognitive Therapy and Research, 1977
- Resolving Research Controversy Through Empirical CumulationSociological Methods & Research, 1974
- Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the "Invisible College" HypothesisAmerican Sociological Review, 1969
- The External Validity of ExperimentsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1968
- OPENING THE BLACK BOX OF ‘RELEVANCE’Journal of Documentation, 1967
- Scientific communication: Five themes from social science research.American Psychologist, 1966