Newborn Screening by Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Medium-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 112 (5) , 1005-1015
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.5.1005
Abstract
Objective. To determine whether newborn screening by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCADD) is cost-effective versus not screening and to define the contributions of disease, test, and population parameters on the decision.Methods. A decision-analytic Markov model was designed to perform cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses measuring the discounted, incremental cost per life-year saved and per quality-adjusted life-year saved of newborn screening for MCADD compared with not screening. A hypothetical cohort of neonates made transitions among a set of health states that reflected clinical status, morbidity, and cost. Outcomes were estimated for time horizons of 20 and 70 years. Probabilities and costs were derived from a retrospective chart review of a 32-patient cohort treated over the past 30 years at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, clinical experience with MCADD patient management, patient-family interviews, cost surveys, state sources, and published studies. In addition to older patients who came to medical attention by symptomatic presentation, our patient group included 6 individuals whose MCADD had been diagnosed by supplemental newborn screening. Estimates of the expected net changes in costs and life expectancy for MCADD screening were used to compute the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Sensitivity analyses were performed on key input variables, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed through second-order Monte Carlo simulations.Results. In our base-case analysis over the first 20 years of life, the cost of newborn screening for MCADD was approximately $11 000 (2001 US dollars; 95% CI: <$0–$33 800) per life-year saved, or $5600 (95% CI: <$0–$17 100) per quality-adjusted life-year saved compared with not screening. Over a 70-year horizon, the respective ratios were approximately $300 (95% CI: <$0–$13 000) and $100 (95% CI: <$0–$6900). The results were robust when tested over plausible ranges for diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity, MCADD prevalence, asymptomatic rate, and screening cost.Conclusions. Simulation modeling indicates that newborn screening for MCADD reduces morbidity and mortality at an incremental cost below the range for accepted health care interventions. At the 70-year horizon, the model predicts that almost all of the additional costs of screening would be offset by avoided sequelae.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic Screening of NewbornsAnnual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2000
- Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and MedicinePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- Medium–chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency: Clinical course in 120 affected childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1994
- Economic evaluation of cost‐benefit ratio of neonatal screening procedure for phenylketonuria and hypothyroidismJournal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, 1991
- Neonatal screening for sickle cell disease: A cost-effectiveness analysisThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Tandem mass spectrometry: A new method for acylcarnitine profiling with potential for neonatal screening for inborn errors of metabolismJournal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, 1990
- Recognition of medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in asymptomatic siblings of children dying of sudden infant death or Reye-like syndromesThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1986
- Economic Evaluation of Neonatal Intensive Care of Very-Low-Birth-Weight InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Health Economic Analysis of the Swedish Neonatal Metabolic Screening ProgrammeMedical Decision Making, 1982
- The Manchester regional screening programme: a 10-year exercise in patient and family care.BMJ, 1979