Regional differences in awareness and attitudes regarding genetic testing for disease risk and ancestry
Open Access
- 13 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Human Genetics
- Vol. 128 (3) , 249-260
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-010-0845-0
Abstract
Little is known about the lay public’s awareness and attitudes concerning genetic testing and what factors influence their perspectives. The existing literature focuses mainly on ethnic and socioeconomic differences; however, here we focus on how awareness and attitudes regarding genetic testing differ by geographical regions in the US. We compared awareness and attitudes concerning genetic testing for disease risk and ancestry among 452 adults (41% Black and 67% female) in four major US cities, Norman, OK; Cincinnati, OH; Harlem, NY; and Washington, DC; prior to their participation in genetic ancestry testing. The OK participants reported more detail about their personal ancestries (p = 0.02) and valued ancestry testing over disease testing more than all other sites (p < 0.01). The NY participants were more likely than other sites to seek genetic testing for disease (p = 0.01) and to see benefit in finding out more about one’s ancestry (p = 0.02), while the DC participants reported reading and hearing more about genetic testing for African ancestry than all other sites (p < 0.01). These site differences were not better accounted for by sex, age, education, self-reported ethnicity, religion, or previous experience with genetic testing/counseling. Regional differences in awareness and attitudes transcend traditional demographic predictors, such as ethnicity, age and education. Local sociocultural factors, more than ethnicity and socioeconomic status, may influence the public’s awareness and belief systems, particularly with respect to genetics.Keywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient Responses to Genetic Information: Studies of Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Identify Issues for Use of Genetic Testing in Nephrology PracticeSeminars in Nephrology, 2010
- Participation in Genetic Testing Research Varies by Social GroupPublic Health Genomics, 2010
- Genetic Ancestry, Social Classification, and Racial Inequalities in Blood Pressure in Southeastern Puerto RicoPLOS ONE, 2009
- Public interest in predictive genetic testing, including direct-to-consumer testing, for susceptibility to major depression: preliminary findingsEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2009
- The Scientific Foundation for Personal Genomics: Recommendations from a National Institutes of Health–Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Multidisciplinary WorkshopGenetics in Medicine, 2009
- Social Networkers' Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome TestingAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2009
- Preconceptional ancestry-based carrier couple screening for cystic fibrosis and haemoglobinopathies: what determines the intention to participate or not and actual participation?European Journal of Human Genetics, 2009
- Race and ancestry in biomedical research: exploring the challengesGenome Medicine, 2009
- Identification of common genetic variants that account for transcript isoform variation between human populationsHuman Genetics, 2008
- Misdirected precautionNature, 2008