What makes some indirect speech acts conventional?
- 30 April 1986
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Memory and Language
- Vol. 25 (2) , 181-196
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(86)90028-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Literal Meaning and Psychological Theory*Cognitive Science, 1984
- Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1983
- A critical examination of the contribution of literal meaning to understanding nonliteral discourseText & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 1982
- Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requestsJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981
- Responding to indirect speech actsCognitive Psychology, 1979
- Contextual effects in understanding indirect requests∗Discourse Processes, 1979
- Spatial comprehension and comparison processes in verification tasksCognitive Psychology, 1978
- Is Sybil there? the structure of some American English directivesLanguage in Society, 1976
- Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification.Psychological Review, 1975
- The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological researchJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973