The cost of phenotypic evolution
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Paleobiology
- Vol. 10 (3) , 319-327
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300008290
Abstract
Formulae are developed for the fraction of the population that must be eliminated by selection in each generation in order to account for a given rate of evolution in a metrical trait. A combination of directional and stabilizing selection is assumed. The effects of competition based on phenotypic value are also considered. The formulae are applied to data on evolutionary rates and their variances. It is concluded that most selective elimination is due to stabilizing selection, and that even very rapid evolutionary change in a single character usually involves low levels of additional elimination. It is suggested that long-sustained evolutionary trends are unlikely to be caused either by gradual change of the optimum under stabilizing selection or by the effects of competitive selection in favor of extreme individuals. It is possible that genetic correlations between traits under selection may limit the response of a single trait to directional selection and hence produce very gradual change.This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Macroevolution: Pattern and Process.Systematic Zoology, 1980
- Rates of size increase and of phyletic evolutionNature, 1976
- Natural selection for quantitative charactersHeredity, 1971
- “Haldane's Dilemma” and the Rate of EvolutionNature, 1968
- Possible Rates of Gene Substitution in EvolutionThe American Naturalist, 1968
- Selection in Natural Populations. III. Measurement and EstimationEvolution, 1965
- Measurement of Natural Selection in Natural PopulationsNature, 1964
- Selection in Natural Populations: Merychippus Primus, a Fossil HorseNature, 1963
- Phyletic Size Increase, An Important Trend Illustrated by Fossil InvertebratesEvolution, 1949
- Evolution in populations in approximate equilibriumJournal of Genetics, 1935