Idioventricular rhythm complicating acute myocardial infarction
Open Access
- 1 September 1970
- Vol. 32 (5) , 617-621
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.32.5.617
Abstract
The incidence, natural history, prognosis, and electrocardiographic characteristics of idioventricular rhythm complicating acute myocardial infarction are described. It occurred as a transient arrhythmia nearly always within 24 hours of infarction in 61 (8%) of 737 patients, and was characterized by paroxysms of between 6 and 20 beats with widened bizarre QRS complexes at a rate of between 60 and 90 a minute. Most cases showed fusion beats and P waves dissociated from the QRS complexes, and in many cases idioventricular rhythm started during the slow phase of sinus arrhythmia. Though it usually occurred in patients with moderately severe transmural infarcts, the incidence of ventricular fibrillation and subsequent mortality was no greater than in patients with infarcts of equivalent severity who did not have idioventricular rhythm. It is concluded that this rhythm is a common and relatively benign arrhythmia complicating myocardial infarction, and that it should be distinguished from ventricular tachycardia.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Idioventricular TachycardiaDiseases of the Chest, 1969
- Incidence and management of ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction.Heart, 1969
- Recent advances in the differential diagnosis of A-V junctional arrhythmiasAmerican Heart Journal, 1968
- Acute coronary care.1968
- Reevaluation of Electrocardiographic and Bedside Criteria for Diagnosis of Ventricular TachycardiaCirculation, 1967
- Cardiac Arrhythmias in Acute Myocardial Infarction II. Incidence of the Common Arrhythmias with Special Reference to Ventricular TachycardiaDiseases of the Chest, 1967
- Natural history and clinical significance of arrhythmias after acute cardiac infarction.Heart, 1967
- A-V dissociation revisitedProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1966
- Arrhythmias in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1964