Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The Poum Hypothesis
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Vol. 116 (2) , 447-487
- https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530151144078
Abstract
This paper examines the often stated idea that the poor do not support high levels of redistribution because of the hope that they, or their offspring, may make it up the income ladder. This “prospect of upward mobility” (POUM) hypothesis is shown to be fully compatible with rational expectations, and fundamentally linked to concavity in the mobility process. A steady-state majority could even be simultaneously poorer than average in terms of current income, and richer than average in terms of expected future incomes. A first empirical assessment suggests, on the other hand, that in recent U. S. data the POUM effect is probably dominated by the demand for social insurance.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Who wants to redistribute?Journal of Public Economics, 2000
- Self Confidence: Intrapersonal StrategiesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
- Consumption Over the Life CyclePublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1999
- Why Have the Rabble not Redistributed the Wealth? On the Stability of Democracy and Unequal PropertyPublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- Social Mobility and Redistributive PoliticsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995
- Distributive Politics and Economic GrowthThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994
- Measuring Social MobilityJournal of Economic Theory, 1993
- U.S. INCOME MOBILITY IN THE SEVENTIES AND EIGHTIESReview of Income and Wealth, 1993
- Monotone mobility matricesThe Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1990
- Monotone matrices and monotone Markov processesStochastic Processes and their Applications, 1977