Evaluation of genetic and environmental effects using GEE and APM methods
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Genetic Epidemiology
- Vol. 12 (6) , 729-734
- https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.1370120633
Abstract
Two analytic methods were used in the Problem 2 data set. First, generalized estimating equations (GEE) modelling was developed to adjust for familial correlation in regressions evaluating candidate genes and an environmental factor. Second, the affected‐pedigree‐member (APM) method was used to identify chromosomal regions of interest and linkage of candidate genes with disease affection status. The GEE method identified C5 (MG1) as important for the quantitative trait Q1 and the corresponding affection status DIS, but the APM method was only suggestive. The GEE method identified C2 (MG2) as important for Q2 but only marginally important for Q1 and not important for DIS.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Linkage detection by the Affected‐Pedigree‐Member method: What is really tested?Genetic Epidemiology, 1993
- Linkage between quantitative trait and marker loci: Methods using all relative pairsGenetic Epidemiology, 1993
- A generalized estimating equations approach to fitting major gene models in segregation analysis of continuous phenotypesGenetic Epidemiology, 1993
- Design effects for binary regression models fitted to dependent dataStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Strategies based on marker information for the study of human diseasesAnnals of Human Genetics, 1992
- Measuring familial aggregation by using odds‐ratio regression modelsGenetic Epidemiology, 1991
- A generalized non‐iterative approach to the analysis of family dataAnnals of Human Genetics, 1991
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986
- Linear regression analysis with repeated measurementsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1984
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified ModelsEconometrica, 1982