The use of immunological techniques in the analysis of archaeological materials — a response to Eisele; with report of studies at Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- other
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Vol. 70 (269) , 677-682
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x00083836
Abstract
Eisele et al. in ANTIQUITY (1995) reported discouraging results from experiments to see if blood traces reliably survive on stone tools. Here, issue is taken with aspects of that study, and new research is reported from the celebrated buffalo-jump at Head-Smashed-In, southern Alberta. The great bone-bed there, consisting almost exclusively of bison bones, gives rare opportunity to study remains of a known single species under the genuine conditions of an archaeological site, rather than a supposing simulation.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Molecular biology and archaeology: A prospectus for inter‐disciplinary researchWorld Archaeology, 1993
- Verifying the reliability of blood residue analysis on archaeological toolsJournal of Archaeological Science, 1992
- Proteins from the organic matrix of core-top and fossil planktonic foraminiferaGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1990
- Species identification of cooked meats by enzyme-staining of isoelectricfocusing gelsMeat Science, 1984
- Identification of Cervid Tissues and Hybridization by Serum AlbuminThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1982
- The species identification of very old human bloodstainsForensic Science International, 1979
- Apport de l'immunoelectrophorese pour l'expertise des taches de sang en medecine legaleForensic Science International, 1978
- Blood Cells Preserved in a Mummy 2000 Years OldScience, 1973
- Proteins in dinosaur bones.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1968
- Precipitin Reactions in Forensic Problems: A New Method for Precipitin Reactions on Forensic Blood, Semen and Saliva StainsNature, 1964