Adverse effects of interrupting precordial compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 25 (5) , 733-736
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199705000-00005
Abstract
In the current operation of automated external defibrillators, substantial time may be consumed for a "hands off" interval during which precordial compression is discontinued to allow for automated rhythm analyses before delivery of the electric countershock. The effects of such a pause on the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation were investigated. Prospective, randomized, controlled animal study. Research laboratory. Male Sprague-Dawley rats. Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced in 25 Sprague-Dawley rats. After 4 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation, precordial compression was begun and continued for 6 mins. Animals were then randomized to receive an immediate defibrillation shock or the defibrillation attempt was delayed for intervals of 10, 20, 30, or 40 secs. Immediate defibrillation restored spontaneous circulation in each instance. When defibrillation was delayed for 10 or 20 secs, spontaneous circulation was restored in three of five animals in each group. After a 30-sec delay, spontaneous circulation was restored in only one of five animals (p During resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation, prolongation of the interval between discontinuation of precordial compression and delivery of the first electric countershock substantially compromises the success of cardiac resuscitation. Accordingly, automated defibrillators are likely to be maximally effective if they are programmed to secure minimal "hands off" delay before delivery of the electric countershock. (Crit Care Med 1997; 25:733-736)Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Prehospital experience with defibrillation of coarse ventricular fibrillation: A ten-year reviewAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1990
- From concept to standard-of-care? Review of the clinical experience with automated external defibrillatorsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- Ambulatory sudden cardiac death: Mechanisms of production of fatal arrhythmia on the basis of data from 157 casesAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Use of the Automatic External Defibrillator in the Management of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- EMT-defibrillation: National Guidelines for implementationThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1987
- Cardiac arrest treated with a new automatic external defibrillator by out-of-hospital first respondersThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- What is a “save”?: Outcome measures in clinical evaluations of automatic external defibrillatorsAmerican Heart Journal, 1985
- Treatment of Ventricular FibrillationPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1984
- Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests with Rapid Defibrillation by Emergency Medical TechniciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980