An application of meta-analysis techniques in the evaluation of adverse experiences with antihypertensive agents
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Vol. 8 (3) , 169-177
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1557(199905/06)8:3<169::aid-pds416>3.0.co;2-f
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Slowing of mitral valve annular calcium in systemic hypertension by nifedipine and comparisons with enalapril and atenololThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Update of effects of calcium antagonists in myocardial infarction or angina in light of the second danish verapamil infarction trial (DAVIT-II) and other recent studiesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate HypertensionJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1991
- Calcium channel blockers in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina: an overview.BMJ, 1989
- A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Comparison of Amlodipine and Atenolol in Mild to Moderate Systemic HypertensionJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1988
- Comparison of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide for systemic hypertensionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Diltiazem versus propranolol in essential hypertension: Responses of rest and exercise blood pressure and effects on exercise capacityThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Tiapamil and Hydrochlorothiazide: A Double‐Blind Comparison of Two Antihypertensive AgentsThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1987
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Comparative effects of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide in blacks with systemic hypertensionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985